Tornadoes Strike Western New York – Corfu and Darien Suffer Significant Storm Damage

An extremely rare series of tornadoes struck western New York this weekend, causing significant damage from east of Buffalo to west of Rochester.  All of the confirmed tornadoes have been designated as F1 on the enhanced Fujita scale. Storm Specifics Location: Darien and Corfu, Genesee County, New York Date: Saturday July 25, 2009 Time of [...]

FCC Granted Monopoly to Sirius-XM, Customers Pay The Price Again and Again

The FCC and Department of Justice dropped the ball on approving the merger between XM and Sirius. The results? Rate increases and new fees for access to the new satellite radio monopoly.

Welcome from Phillip Dampier

A personal welcome from me, and more information about my projects, interests, and how to reach me.

Recent Articles:

ESPNU Added to Comcast Digital Lineups in Many Areas

170px-ESPN_U.svgComcast’s agreement with ESPN to rollout ESPNU, its college sports network, has begun to bear fruit as Comcast unveils the channel on many of its systems nationwide.

ESPNU provides college sports fans with more than 550 live events annually and televises some of the top Division I conferences in the nation, including: the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, MAC, SEC, Sun Belt and WAC.  The network also has a wide-ranging, long-term agreement with the NCAA that includes extensive coverage of 22 NCAA Championships, including sports from each of the three collegiate seasons.

Already available from Comcast’s competitors, including AT&T U-verse, Verizon FiOS, DirecTV and DISH Network, the new channel will appear on Comcast’s digital programming tier often marketed as Digital Classic.  The network is not available to standard analog service customers.  For digital customers, checking your local channel lineup is essential as Comcast systems have introduced it on different channel numbers on just about every system.

In Connecticut alone, ESPNU’s channel position varies:

ESPNU is on channel 735 in Hartford as well as in the towns of Andover, Avon, Berlin, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bristol, Burlington, Canton, East Hartford, Ellington, Farmington, Hebron, Marlborough, New Britain, Plainville, Simsbury, Tolland, Vernon, West Hartford and Windsor.

It’s on channel 178 in Bozrah, Colchester, East Haddam, Franklin, Haddam Neck, Libson, Lyme, Norwich, Old Lyme, Preston, Salem and Sprague.

It’s on 154 in Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Derby, Middlebury, Naugatuck, Oxford, Plymouth, Prospect, Seymour, Shelton, Waterbury and Wolcott.

And it’s on channel 279 most other places on Comcast digital, including the city of Hartford.

Comcast customers can also enjoy ESPN360, ESPN’s 24/7 broadband sports network which offers more than 3,500 live, global sports events annually. ESPN360.com is available at no additional charge through Comcast.net to Comcast High-Speed Internet customers.


MSNBC Launches MSNBC HD & New Shows: My Impressions

msnbcMSNBC this week launched MSNBC HD, the High Definition version of the NBC cable news network, with a new on-air look and a new programming lineup, mostly consisting of additional specialty opinion shows.  MSNBC in HD will launch at different times on different cable systems. It launched on Cablevision on June 29 and will be a part of Time Warner Cable’s lineup this month. By the end of August, MSNBC HD will be available in 11 million homes.

The “new on air look” has not been particularly pretty, especially the horizontal bar across the top of the screen, left there throughout the broadcasts and containing little more than the network logo and occasional time checks and slogans.  It needs to go.

A new news-ticker at the bottom is busier than the old news crawler, but occupies less screen real estate.  I’m not sure who is going to read this, considering the text size is quite small.  It’s simply more distraction, all thanks to a trend in cable news post-9/11 that has never gone away.

The new shows:

At 9:00ET, the news roundup is gone, replaced with “Morning Meeting” with Dylan Ratigan from 9-11am.  The first week of shows has not been terribly impressive — more of the same kind of talking head banter we just watched from Morning Joe for the three hours preceding.  The set is also austere.  Outside of Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough, Dylan Ratigan is the third person on MSNBC who likes to hear himself talk.  When he talks, time stops.  When someone else talks, it’s ‘hurry up so I can get our other guests in.’  A gracious host learns to hush up and listen.

At 11am, Carlos Watson anchors an hour of straight news, but I’m typically long gone by 11.  It’s a shame Dylan couldn’t run from 10-12 and leave an hour at 9am for actual news and less opinion.

At 12pm, Dr. Nancy (Snyderman) is on for an hour of medical-related news (which this week was an excuse to talk about how many pills Michael Jackson was popping.)  I am not sure how interested people are going to be in a medical news show at 12 noon.  I expect a lot of viewers interested in news are watching the lunchtime local news on broadcast stations.

Andrea Mitchell continues at 1-2pm, doing straight-up news.  David Shuster, who always seems to be yelling, joins Tamron Hall (who doesn’t) from 3-5pm for more news.

MSNBC seems to be essentially creating a talk radio format for television, with personality-driven current affairs and opinion programming blocks.  It gives viewers a reason to tune in on slow news days to see their favorite personalities, but is still flexible enough to wipe all of that out for breaking news.

Dell Financial Services Nightmares – And How You Can Solve Them

My Dell statement showing retroactively billed finance charges, despite having paid off the balance before the promotion expiration date. (click to enlarge)

My Dell statement showing retroactively billed finance charges, despite having paid off the balance before the promotion expiration date. (click to enlarge)

Few credit cards generate as many complaints as those issued by CIT Bank on behalf of Dell, Inc.  The “Dell Preferred Account” allows consumers to use special 0% financing rate payment plans to budget their purchases without incurring interest charges… as long as the required minimum payments are made on time, and the balance is paid entirely in full by the date the finance plan expires.

Dell absolves itself of much of the responsibility it should have regarding its credit program by claiming a third party company is responsible for administering it.  Indeed, CIT Bank, which handles store credit card programs for a myriad of retailers, is an independent entity that hands out credit cards and manages the billing and servicing of accounts.  Dell should realize, however, that a company doing business using its name and reputation which serves consumers poorly harms the Dell brand.

Clearly, there is a long history of problems with Dell Financial Services that has led to settlements with several state Attorneys General.  Among them, these allegations raised in a settlement document:

  • Dell offered credit promotions, including 0% interest financing offers to consumers without appropriate disclosure that not everyone applying would qualify for the 0% finance offer.  Customers often made purchases assuming they were qualified, and were extended credit in some instances at a much higher percentage rate than advertised;
  • Informing some consumers they were qualified for 0% financing offers when they were in fact not qualified;
  • Not providing warranty service in accordance with promises made, or as state law requires;
  • Not providing next day warranty service when promised;
  • Not fulfilling rebates

A settlement agreement was supposed to have resolved most of these problems, but clearly have not, at least from the complaints that continue to pour into sites like The Consumerist and Ripoff Report.  In fact, I know someone who is a victim of Dell Financial Services — myself.

On a promotional purchase I made about a year ago, at 0% interest, I configured automatic payments for Dell in equal monthly installments, designed to pay the balance in full prior to the expiration date of the financing plan.  I’m well accustomed to such promotions, having participated in them with Comp-USA, Circuit City, Best Buy, and others.  It’s not a difficult concept.  Just make sure your minimum payment requirement is always fulfilled and that the balance reaches zero for that promotion before the expiration date.

When a payment for May went astray, I contacted Dell Financial Services customer service by telephone and inquired about a missing payment.  It was to be deducted automatically from my checking account, and indeed it had been right on schedule, but never turned up posted to my account.  A Dell representative claimed to have put a “trace” on the missing payment, and offered to accept a substitute payment just in case the results were not available prior to the upcoming expiration date of my financing plan.  That was acceptable to me, if only to save time and hassle asking for credit later for any accrued finance charges billed because a promotion was not paid in full by its expiration.

Little did I realize this was to start a bungling of my account and an avalanche of fees and interest charges.  The missing payment also turned up a few days later.

The bad news arrived on my late May bill.  The telephone payment carried with it a “convenience payment fee” of $9.95 charged a week after the payment was made.  Additionally, despite the statement reflecting a fully paid off promotion one day before its expiration, Dell billed deferred finance charges retroactively back to the date of purchase, to the tune of $80.21.  New owing balance on an account that should have had a zero balance?  $90.16!

Contacting Dell customer service to resolve this billing foul-up proved to be an impossible endeavor.  Several e-mails went unanswered, despite being assigned case numbers and acknowledged by Dell’s e-mail auto-response system.  Telephone calls to customer service resulted in 30 minute hold times, the maximum allowed, before an announcement was made that “technical problems” prevented the call from reaching an agent, and was summarily disconnected.

Unacceptable.

Perusing the Better Business Bureau website listing for Dell Financial Services, I found something interesting — the company has a pretty strong record of “resolved” complaints, meaning that when a complaint was filed with the BBB, Dell paid attention to fixing them to the satisfaction of the consumer.

I filed my own complaint with the Central Texas Better Business Bureau on June 2nd.  By June 11th, the matter was completely resolved.  Not only did Dell Financial Services refund the interest charges, it also credited back the $9.95 payment convenience fee nonsense, and gave me written assurance that the account had a zero balance:

To: Central TX Better Business Bureau
BBB CASE#: [redacted]

Dear Better Business Bureau Representative,

We are in receipt of a complaint originally addressed to the Better Business Bureau. In the complaint the customer expresses dissatisfaction in regards to the deferred finance charges assessed on the Dell Preferred Account.

Please accept our sincere apologies for any disappointment they feel they have experienced during their transactions and contacts with Dell Financial Services.

Dell Financial Services records indicate that [I] paid the full purchase price before the expiration date of the promotion, as indicated on their billing statement, and paid the Minimum Payment Due each billing period when due, no Finance Charges will be imposed on the purchase. [I] was credited deferred finance charges of $80.21 and $9.95 for a payment convenience fee. The credits will take effect immediately and will appear on their June 12, 2009 billing statement.  Please allow this letter to serve as confirmation that the current account balance is $0.00 and DFS considers the account to be paid in full.

In addition, a refund check for $30 was mailed to the address listed on the Dell Preferred Account.  Please allow 7-10 business to receive the payment refund check.

We regret any inconvenience this matter may have caused and thank them for bringing this matter to our attention.

It is our hope that we have adequately clarified our position in regards to this complaint.  Please do not hesitate to contact us should the BBB or the customer need further clarification.

Sincerely,
Sylvia Alexander
Executive Services
Dell Financial Services L.L.C.

With this rapid resolution, my advice for anyone experiencing stonewalling or unresponsive customer service within Dell Financial Services file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau.  It literally took just a few minutes, and saved me an enormous amount of time and frustration.

It’s unfortunate that Dell has not taken more aggressive measures to prevent these problems from occurring in the first place.  Dell Financial Services’ account management website is among the worst I’ve ever encountered.  Online payments are processed by a third party company — Checkfree, and scheduling a payment involves accessing Checkfree’s portal payment system from within Dell’s website.  I have found Checkfree’s system to be unreliable and suffers frequent extended outages, making it impossible to schedule payments and feel confident they will be made on time.  The company also has a confusing payment policy that suggests payments are “normally” made by Checkfree on the next business day, but in fact elsewhere Dell Financial Services claims it can take 3-5 days for them to “receive” a payment scheduled through Checkfree.  That can create confusion for consumers with an approaching due date.  A same day payment option is also offered, but carries a $9.95 fee for using it, which is ridiculous.

Consumers trying to schedule payments over an entire year to pay off a 0% promotional offer will find doing so through the website nearly impossible.  Direct auto-debiting your payment from your checking account also requires a copy of a canceled check and the completion of an authorization form which must be faxed or mailed to them.  That is cumbersome and unnecessary.  Most online payment systems simply require information from a check to set these payments up, not an actual copy of a check.

Of course, these are tricks and traps designed to stick consumers with “gotcha” fees if they attempt to make a payment on or very near to the due date, discourage consumers from setting up automatic payment scheduling for the Dell credit account, and instead have to remember to visit the website each month to schedule payments manually, assuming Checkfree’s portal is working that day.  Under these circumstances, late payment fees and other extra charges associated with making payments are common for those holding Dell credit accounts.

In my situation, attempting to impose retroactive finance charges on a paid-in-full balance is a special kind of customer abuse, but something you need not have to accept.

How to File a Better Business Bureau complaint against Dell Financial Services:

… Continue Reading

Orange County HD Lineup Expansions: Cable Remains Woefully Behind Other Providers

Verizon FiOS continues to offer the largest number of HD channels in the Orange County region of California, offering more than double the number of HD channels that cable operators Cox and Time Warner provide to their respective customers.  Cox Cable has just signed an agreement with Viacom to introduce its HD networks to the Cox Cable lineup effective at the end of July.  But even with the additions, Cox remains in distant fifth place behind telephone company video systems and satellite television providers.

Orange County Providers
Number of HD Channels
7/09
Verizon FiOS 127
DirecTV 124
AT&T U-verse 112
Dish Networks 93
Cox Cable 62
Time Warner 55
New Viacom Networks for Cox Channel
FX HD 717
BET HD 748
MTV HD 749
VH1 HD 750
Spike HD 752
CMT HD 759
Comedy HD 760
Nickelodeon HD 770
Cartoon Network HD 771
Cox Channel Changes
Network
Was Now
Versus HD 717 765
Universal HD 744 788
Palladia HD 749 789
CNBC HD 750 744

Fun With Gutters

It looks like one of our gutters has finally decided enough is enough with all the rain and will require replacement.  If any of my western NY readers have any advice/recommendations/experiences about local contractors, I’d sure love to hear from you in our Comment section.  Just click the Comments link beneath the headline, or just click on the headline itself and you should find a place to leave your comments.  Thanks!

Shaw Cable Turns Down Deal to Buy Three TV Stations for $1 Each

logoShaw Cable, a Canadian cable operator, yesterday announced it would not proceed with a deal to purchase three CTV-owned television stations in Canada for $1 each.

CTVglobemedia, owner of Canada’s largest commercial television network, said it could no longer profitably run the stations unless Canadian regulators allowed them to charge cable operators “carriage fees” for carrying the TV stations on cable systems.  Shaw, owner of one such cable system, strongly rejected the idea and agreed to purchase the stations after CTV offered to sell them for just one Canadian loonie each.

Yesterday, CTV announced Shaw would not be proceeding with the deal, although Shaw has yet to publicly comment.

The three stations, a CTV affiliate in Brandon, Manitoba and two “A” network affiliates in Windsor and Wingham, Ontario, were planned to be shut down by August if buyers could not be found.

Had Canadian regulators agreed to cable carriage fees, it would have brought an additional $300 million in revenue to CTVglobemedia.

As the economy continues to struggle, many smaller Canadian cities could potentially lose network affiliated TV stations that have been running unprofitably in the difficult current economic climate.  The CRTC (similar to the FCC in the United States) plans to release details of a new Local Programming Improvement Fund, designed to help underwrite expenses at Canadian stations serving fewer than one million viewers, early this month.

Climate Change: Rochester Drowns in June – 8th Wettest/19th Coolest In 139 Years of Weather Records

The June climate summary is now in from the National Weather Service office for greater Rochester and it speaks to one issue — rain.   It just doesn’t seem to stop, particularly during the second half of June with storm after storm.

June was a tale of two months in the Rochester area.  It started out with a continuation of the preceding spring months with quiet and pleasant conditions for its first half, but then turned very unsettled and stormy during its second half.  This was especially true during the final week when repeated storms brought excessive rainfall across the region.  Overall, Rochester had its 8th wettest and 19th coolest June in its 139 years of weather records.

The average temperature of 63.5 was 2.3 degrees cooler than average.  There were no extremes or records, but very consistent temperatures.  Nineteen of the month’s first 21 days averaged normal or a little below, which was finally balanced out a bit by six consecutive warm days from June 22-27th.  This period featured the only humid period of the month, the bulk of which was very comfortable in the temperature department.  In fact, only two days reached the 80s this June in Rochester, matching 1889 with the fewest 80 degree days ever in June.  Normally the city gets 13 such days during the month.

Rainfall was the big story of the month.  It totaled 6.25 inches, nearly double the normal of 3.36 inches.  Even more fell across the northern and eastern portions of the metro area, with up to 8 inches reported.  The month started out deceivingly dry, with no rain until the 8th and just 1.25 inches through the 16th.  But two very wet periods ensued: with 2.84 inches falling from the 17th-20th and another 2.01 inches from the 26th-30th.

The unsettled weather of the final week took its toll on our usual abundant June sunshine.  The monthly total, as measured at nearby Buffalo and considered representative for Rochester, of 54% was 11% shy of normal and the least for June in nine years.  It also ended a streak of unusually sunny months which began in January.  Still, sunshine was no stranger as 12 days were mostly sunny while nine were mostly cloudy during the month.

The month’s first half was quiet, mild, and dry.  Ground moisture was becoming short.  Then the pattern changed with a very wet period from June 17-20th.  Three of the four days had no sun at all, a rarity in June here.  Up to two inches of rain caused some local flooding across eastern suburbs of Irondequoit, Brighton, Pittsford, Webster, Penfield, and East Rochester on June 17, with a similar amount area wide on June 20th.  The 1.58 inches on June 20th at the Rochester airport was an all-time daily record.  After a taste of summer for a few days, violent storms raked the area on the 26th with hail and over two inches of rain closer to Lake Ontario resulting in urban flooding.  More heavy rains during the afternoon of June 30th caused additional street flooding.  The month ended with the area under a cool unsettled pattern.

Summing up, a good start but an ugly finish to June in Rochester.

AT&T to Hand Over $65 Million to Missouri Communities to Settle Underpayment of Taxes

June 30, 2009 Telephone No Comments

Hundreds of communities across Missouri stand to benefit from a $65 million settlement AT&T will pay to settle a 2004 class-action municipal lawsuit over taxes on landlines. The municipalities charged in their suit that AT&T has been systematically underpaying telephone taxes by excluding several charges applied to customer bills from AT&T’s reported gross receipts. Most municipalities will deposit any settlement money into their general revenue funds.

The amounts vary widely:

  • Hannibal, Missouri — $256,041.76
  • Louisiana, Missouri — $58,827.39
  • Bowling Green, Missouri — $50,908.08
  • LaGrange, Missouri — $0.12

Irrational Thinking: Exclusive Handset Deals Are Good for Consumers, Good for Competition, Says AT&T

June 30, 2009 Mobile Phones No Comments

Sometimes you wonder about drug testing people who come up with amazing lapses of logic like this:

Paul Roth from AT&T said in sworn congressional testimony that removing exclusive deals “would serve only to harm consumers.”  He also claimed “devices would devolve into the lowest common technical denominator.”

The issue?  Exclusive deals for cell phones.  AT&T exclusively provides the iPhone in the United States.  Other carriers, usually AT&T or Verizon, have exclusive deals to sell the latest and greatest equipment on their networks only, limiting consumers who want those phones to the carrier that sells it.

Unfortunately, since not every carrier has the best signal coverage in every part of the country, a consumer that wants an iPhone, for example, would be throwing money away buying one only to learn AT&T has lousy or non-existent service in his neighborhood.  If Verizon offered rock solid service, you’d be stuck because the iPhone will not work on Verizon’s network.

Roth’s claim is ridiculous on its face, because most consumers will not buy a phone that will not work where they want to use it.  Many others on another carrier will not switch providers just to obtain a phone, even if it is an iPhone.  AT&T may not do as well in a completely open marketplace where any phone is available from any carrier, because they extract top dollar pricing from iPhone users, who are stuck with a monthly cell phone bill running $70 plus.

Credit Card Abuse: Chase Unilaterally More Than Doubles Minimum Payment With No Opt Out

June 30, 2009 Consumer Issues 2 Comments
Chase mailed this "change of terms" home to nearly one million cardholders this month. Click to enlarge.

Chase mailed this "change of terms" home to nearly one million cardholders this month. Click to enlarge.

Your mailbox has probably been filling up recently with credit card companies sending you change of terms notices on your credit card accounts.  In the past, most of the gouging took place when your credit score dropped or if you missed a minimum payment, or utilized too much of your available credit.  These days, even those with FICO scores in the high 700s are seeing an end to fixed interest rates, replaced with something far higher, and free to float even higher as the Fed increases its own benchmark rate in the future.

Since the passage of recent legislation to put an end to the most egregious abuses, Congress mucked things up by not imposing the law immediately, and instead gave credit card companies nearly a year for a gouging free-for-all before the new law takes effect.  They’re taking full advantage.

A special place in hell has been reserved for Chase, however, which has pulled out all of the stops and gone shameless like no other credit card company has before.  Using the ethics of Bernie Madoff, some pencil pushers at Chase have decided that smart customers who hopped on board those near-weekly balance transfer offers they used to mail to cardholders, offering a fixed low percentage rate for the “life of the balance” don’t deserve that offer anymore.

Since the bank got slapped for trying to impose a $10 monthly “account maintenance fee,” they’ve decided to opt instead for a more than doubling of the monthly minimum payment, effective August 1st.

In a “change of terms” notice mailed home to hundreds of thousands of Chase cardholders who have a fixed rate balance transfer offer, the company has singled them out with the payment change:

Before:  Your minimum payment consists of 2% of the owing balance on your account plus accrued interest charges and fees.

After: Your minimum payment consists of 5% of the owing balance on your account plus accrued interest charges and fees.

The company has also announced it has canceled all pre-existing balance transfer offers floating around in your mailbox, drawer, or attached to your latest bill.  That’s because it is also changing the terms and conditions on future balance transfer offers.  The days of “life of the balance” transfers are over, so expect to find 7% offers good for six-twelve months maximum being the new standard for creditworthy consumers.  But in addition, Chase will charge you a 5%, the highest in the industry, of whatever balance you do choose to transfer their way, with no maximum, as a “balance transfer fee.”

At first glance, a 3% increase in the minimum payment does not appear to be that great.  But what makes this especially awful on the part of Chase is that their change in terms contains NO opt out provision.  You are trapped, unless you can transfer the remaining balance away (and confront higher interest, another balance transfer fee, and a time-limited offer in the process).  Consumers in this extremely tough economic climate are often budgeting their payment obligations to the penny, and are focusing on paying down debt starting with the highest interest rate, and then moving to the next highest interest rate, and so on.  Chase wants to be first in line, and for consumers who are capably managing to reduce their debt, a near-tripling of the minimum payment will put many people straight into default.

Consumers with a minimum payment of $200 will now have to cough up $500 a month.  It’s not such a small amount after all.

One person told ConsumerAffairs:

“My monthly payment from my four accounts will go from $961.00 a month to $2394.00 a month. Needless to say I will not be able to make these payments and will end up defaulting on my accounts and probably claim bankruptcy.”

In general, increases in minimum payment requirements do reduce debt more quickly, and reduce your exposure to interest charges.  Paying a credit card in full exposes you to no interest charges (yet).

But in the real world, where many consumers do have long-standing debt, the reasons this is particularly egregious:

  1. A more than doubling of a minimum payment on hard-pressed consumers will rapidly tip people into default.  An incremental increase in the minimum payment with considerable notice is one thing.  A 30 day notice is not.
  2. Should Chase get away with this, it will establish a precedent other card companies will surely follow.  Anyone with revolving balances could easily find themselves underwater with the impact of Hurricane Katrina.
  3. Consumers were sold on the idea of the original deal, which Chase now wants to right to unilaterally change for its own benefit.  It’s like a mortgage company coming to you and demanding a doubling of your house payment… just because.
  4. One outrageous anti-consumer abuse will lead to others.  How about account inactivity fees?  Interest rates from the date of purchase with no grace period?  Annual fees?

American Express has been reportedly reducing credit lines for customers who are caught using their AmEx cards at the “wrong stores.”  One cardholder found his credit line reduced to the owed balance after shopping at Wal-Mart.  The reason? Customers who routinely shop at those stores are more likely to default on their account than those that don’t, so you’re guilty by association.

Remember, your entire financial state depends on your credit score.  Once you find a credit line reduced or miss a payment, it’s like putting yourself in a barrel over Niagara Falls.  Here’s what routinely happens:

  1. Your credit line is reduced to your owing balance on one card, putting your card utilization percentage at near 100%, which reduces your FICO score.
  2. Other credit card companies doing routine credit checks discover the red flag of a credit score decline and credit utilization ratio problem.  They also reduce credit lines on your other accounts.
  3. Your FICO score now takes a very serious hit as account credit lines decline, which also triggers all of your remaining credit cards to dramatically increase your interest rates because of your increased risk.
  4. Your homeowners and auto insurance policies more likely than not are now also price-impacted by your credit score.  Your policy renewal rate can be substantially higher, or canceled outright.
  5. Your potential employer pulls a credit report and sees you are “irresponsible” with your credit and therefore may also treat your job the same way.  You are not hired.
  6. Your ability to rent or purchase property is seriously affected by a declining credit score.

These days, only one or two minor events in your credit portfolio can trigger a financial avalanche, often before you can maneuver out of the way.  The recent passage of credit card reform will protect against some of the worst industry practices, but not others including their right to reduce your credit line, change your going-forward interest rate, and allow others to access your credit history for non-credit extension purposes.

Chase’s latest is something every consumer should be communicating their extreme displeasure to Congress about.  Even if it doesn’t directly impact you today, allowing any credit card company to get their abusive foot in the door of your family can spell financial disaster for those who are paying their debts, but at the terms and conditions they agreed to when they originated the loans, not the terms the credit card company decided to impose on a whim.